[openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query
Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
gergely.csatari at nokia.com
Mon Dec 11 12:24:17 UTC 2017
Thanks for the answer.
Some clarification questions. You mention that the NFVO works as both an user and an admin for the cloud. Is this becouse the resource usage per user info is more for cloud operators while the resource usage per tenant / per resource provider is more for cloud users?
The solution you described is valid for the capacity per tenant case if I understand right. Is this correct?
From: Masahito MUROI [mailto:muroi.masahito at lab.ntt.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 9:44 AM
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query
I added some comments for GAP-04. It looks like NFVO works as an tenant user and an operator. IMHO, NFVO could calculate the capacity of the cloud.
On 2017/12/06 22:10, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote:
> During the Forum session about the ETSI NFV Gaps I received a request
> to clarify the scope of the capacity query mentioned in [GAP-04] with ETSI NFV.
> The advice is that it should be possible to get the capacity of an
> OpenStack tenant, an user and a resource provider. This is because the
> NFVO might use different tenants and even different users to manage
> the resources in the OpenStack instances.
> Any comments are welcome, also if you need more clarification on the
> gaps listed in  do not hesitate to contact me.
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
More information about the OpenStack-dev