Hey all, We had a really productive conversation [0] regarding the outstanding concerns with the unified limits proposal. The initial implementation for unified limits should target a model so that we can do proper limit validation. The specification has been reworked to include the outcomes of the conversation. I'm proposing we issue a specification freeze exception for the unified limits specification [1]. We've made a ton of good progress on it and wxy has been diligently updating the spec and implementation. If you have any concerns with the new direction or the discussion we had today, please let me know. If everyone is OK with the direction and the exception, we'll plan to have the specification smoothed out and merged by the end of next week. Thanks, Lance [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.2017-12-08.log.html#t2017-12-08T15:00:28 [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/keystone-specs+branch:master+topic:bp/unified-limits -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171208/3511a491/attachment.sig>