[openstack-dev] [neutron] put router in vm rather than namespace

Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo majopela at redhat.com
Mon Dec 4 15:33:50 UTC 2017

That adds more latency, I believe some vendor plugins do it like that
(service VM).

Have you checked out networking-ovn?, it's all done in openflow, and you
have Ha (A/P) for free without extra namespaces, just flows and bfd

On Dec 4, 2017 4:22 PM, "Jaze Lee" <jazeltq at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>     Can we put router into virtual machine rather than in namespace? Then
> the HA, and devops will be more elegant. You can live mirage, and use
> haproxy.
> The namespace can not be live mirage. It is bind to the host and lose
> flexible.
> Or is there some talks or specs about this?
> --
> 谦谦君子
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171204/91972615/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list