[openstack-dev] [neutron][infra] Functional job failure rate at 100%
Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
majopela at redhat.com
Thu Aug 10 07:54:58 UTC 2017
Good (amazing) job folks. :)
El 10 ago. 2017 9:43, "Thierry Carrez" <thierry at openstack.org> escribió:
> Oh, that's good for us. Should still be fixed, if only so that we can
> test properly :)
> Kevin Benton wrote:
> > This is just the code simulating the conntrack entries that would be
> > created by real traffic in a production system, right?
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Jakub Libosvar <jlibosva at redhat.com
> > <mailto:jlibosva at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > On 09/08/2017 18:23, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > > On 2017-08-09 15:29:04 +0200 (+0200), Jakub Libosvar wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> Is it possible to switch used image for jenkins machines to use
> > >> back the older version? Any other ideas how to deal with the
> > >> kernel bug?
> > >
> > > Making our images use non-current kernel packages isn't trivial,
> > > as Thierry points out in his reply this is not just a problem for
> > > our CI system. Basically Ubuntu has broken OpenStack (and probably
> > > variety of other uses of conntrack) for a lot of people following
> > > kernel updates in 16.04 LTS so the fix needs to happen there
> > > regardless. Right now, basically, Ubuntu Xenial is not a good
> > > platform to be running OpenStack on until they get the kernel
> > > regression addressed.
> > True. Fortunately, the impact is not that catastrophic for Neutron
> as it
> > might seem on the first look. Not sure about the other projects,
> > Neutron doesn't create conntrack entries in production code - only in
> > testing. That said, agents should work just fine even with the
> > kernel bug.
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev