Open Stack

On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We
>>> have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please
>>> check yours.
>>>
>>> Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in
>>> Boston.
>>>
>>>
>>> Let us know if you see major issues with it. As Thierry said in design
>>> summits past; "It's difficult to make too many changes at this stage as they
>>> quickly cascade into breaking all sorts of constraints, but we may still be
>>> able to accommodate some." :)
>>>
>>> Eagle-eyed readers will see that there are a number of slots in gray (on
>>> Thursday afternoon). These are being deliberately kept aside for the usual
>>> few critical topics that come up in the next few weeks and also for the
>>> discoveries we make in the first 3 days of the summit.
>>>
>>> We'll soon publish the Forum sessions on the main schedule, using the
>>> title, abstracts and moderators you submitted, but look forward to your
>>> feedback in the mean-time!
>>>
>>> Thank you all very much for making our first Forum a success.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hey Folks,
>>
>> Thanks for working on this.
>>
>> The topic "Future of configuration management tools" seems to have been
>> scheduled twice. Is that expected or a mistake? In the schedule it's not
>> explicit whether it's a 2 parts topic or not.
>
> Good point. I think 1 session to keep is enough and I checked both
> slots, we can pick one of those, I don't see much conflict that would
> prevent folks to have to make an hard choice.
>
> Tom, any chance to remove the second slot please?
>

Yup, this was a mistake, sorry!