[openstack-dev] [nova] Mirror issues with Intel NFV CI?

Matt Riedemann mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Sep 30 14:49:54 UTC 2016


On 9/30/2016 7:46 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote:
> We've fixed the subnet pools issue and left all the jobs in non-voting for testing yesterday. There are issues with cinder volumes highlighted by tempest tests but we'll skip them for the time they're being trobuleshooted and we've put the jobs back to voting.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>  >-----Original Message-----
>  >From: Znoinski, Waldemar
>  >Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 9:27 PM
>  >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>  ><openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>  >Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mirror issues with Intel NFV CI?
>  >
>  >Hi Matt,
>  >
>  >Introduction of using subnetpools in devstack [1] is causing issues like
>  >'Connection to proxy.... timed out. ' in our setup. We are working on it and
>  >will update ML soon. Thanks for pinging.
>  >
>  >[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356026/
>  >
>  >
>  > >-----Original Message-----
>  > >From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
>  > >Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 2:34 PM
>  > >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>  >><openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>  > >Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mirror issues with Intel NFV CI?
>  > >
>  > >I'm seeing a pretty high failure rate with some of the Intel NFV CI jobs
>  >today,  >the pattern looks like a pypi mirror issue getting packages to setup
>  >tempest:
>  > >
>  > >http://intel-openstack-ci-logs.ovh/94/375894/2/check/tempest-dsvm-
>  >intel-
>  > >nfv-xenial/a0bffb3/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz
>  > >
>  > >2016-09-27 02:11:52.127 | Collecting hacking<0.12,>=0.11.0 (from -r
>  >>/opt/stack/new/tempest/test-requirements.txt (line 4))
>  > >2016-09-27 02:12:07.144 |   Retrying (Retry(total=4, connect=None,
>  > >read=None, redirect=None)) after connection broken by
>  >>'ConnectTimeoutError(<pip._vendor.requests.packages.urllib3.connection.
>  >V
>  > >erifiedHTTPSConnection
>  > >object at 0x7faca5b7fd10>, 'Connection to proxy.ir.intel.com timed out.
>  > >(connect timeout=15)')': /simple/hacking/
>  > >2016-09-27 02:12:22.654 |   Retrying (Retry(total=3, connect=None,
>  > >read=None, redirect=None)) after connection broken by
>  >>'ConnectTimeoutError(<pip._vendor.requests.packages.urllib3.connection.
>  >V
>  > >erifiedHTTPSConnection
>  > >object at 0x7faca5b7fe10>, 'Connection to proxy.ir.intel.com timed out.
>  > >(connect timeout=15)')': /simple/hacking/
>  > >2016-09-27 02:12:38.657 |   Retrying (Retry(total=2, connect=None,
>  > >read=None, redirect=None)) after connection broken by
>  >>'ConnectTimeoutError(<pip._vendor.requests.packages.urllib3.connection.
>  >V
>  > >erifiedHTTPSConnection
>  > >object at 0x7faca5b7ff10>, 'Connection to proxy.ir.intel.com timed out.
>  > >(connect timeout=15)')': /simple/hacking/
>  > >2016-09-27 02:12:55.674 |   Retrying (Retry(total=1, connect=None,
>  > >read=None, redirect=None)) after connection broken by
>  >>'ConnectTimeoutError(<pip._vendor.requests.packages.urllib3.connection.
>  >V
>  > >erifiedHTTPSConnection
>  > >object at 0x7faca59e9050>, 'Connection to proxy.ir.intel.com timed out.
>  > >(connect timeout=15)')': /simple/hacking/
>  > >2016-09-27 02:13:14.682 |   Retrying (Retry(total=0, connect=None,
>  > >read=None, redirect=None)) after connection broken by
>  >>'ConnectTimeoutError(<pip._vendor.requests.packages.urllib3.connection.
>  >V
>  > >erifiedHTTPSConnection
>  > >object at 0x7faca59e9150>, 'Connection to proxy.ir.intel.com timed out.
>  > >(connect timeout=15)')': /simple/hacking/
>  > >2016-09-27 02:13:29.687 |   Could not find a version that satisfies the
>  > >requirement hacking<0.12,>=0.11.0 (from -r
>  >/opt/stack/new/tempest/test-  >requirements.txt (line 4)) (from versions: )
>  > >2016-09-27 02:13:29.687 | No matching distribution found for
>  > >hacking<0.12,>=0.11.0 (from -r
>  > >/opt/stack/new/tempest/test-requirements.txt (line 4))  >  >Is this a
>  >known issue that the CI maintainers are fixing?
>  > >
>  > >--
>  > >
>  > >Thanks,
>  > >
>  > >Matt Riedemann
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >>_________________________________________________________
>  >_
>  > >________________
>  > >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>  > >Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
>  > >request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>  > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
> Registered in Ireland
> Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
> Registered Number: 308263
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
> use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender and delete all copies.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

Thanks, I've noticed things got more stable, or at least less noisy, in 
the past couple of days. Thanks for being quick to address this.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list