Open Stack

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016, at 07:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 09/27/2016 06:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> <snip>
> > 
> > I totally understand where you're coming from. I just see it
> > differently.
> > 
> > The way it was done did not affect any other projects, and the plumbing
> > used is something that could have easily be left in. And as luck would
> > have it there's another patch up to use that same plumbing so it's
> > probably going in anyways.
> > 
> > I completely agree that before expanding this to be in any way cross
> > project it's worth figuring out a better way to do it. But at this point
> > I don't feel comfortable enough with a long term vision to tackle that.
> > I would much prefer to experiment in a small way before moving forward.
> 
> Ok, so what if we go forward with your existing patch, but agree only to
> replace the post_test_hook on Nova specific jobs, like the placement
> one. (The change proposed here -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/376537/6/jenkins/jobs/nova.yaml). That
> should give enough data and experimentation, and it show up for every
> nova patch.
> 
> Before migrating this kind of approach to integrated gate jobs, we
> revisit a way to make sure that multiple projects can plumb content like
> this. Be it, expanding the test hook model, or a common post hook
> project that could have core members from multiple teams, or some
> generic yaml thing (though I agree, that's a lot harder to wrap my head
> around).

Deal.

> 
> 	-Sean
> 
> -- 
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev