Open Stack

I agree that sometimes simply filtering for "security" can get a bit noisy
because only very occasionally is an email mentioning it or even using the
[security] tag actually trying to get the attention of the OSSP. Most of
the time (from my filters anyway) it's either a Neutron Security Groups
issue or someone simply using [Security] as a bit of metadata.

However, I'm hesitant to move away from it, as we should be paying
attention to things that do come through with the [Security] tag, it's the
easiest way for someone to try to get us involved if they're having an
issue.

Speaking personally, I think that if we have a sec-project tag, or
something similar, I'll simply end up having twice as many filters, on for
the new tag and one for anyone who's using [security]

I'm interested to know what other users might think though.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:12:53AM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
> > It actually is, but Mailman (unhelpfully) lists tags by their long
> > descriptions. Go ahead and click on the Details link next to the
> > Cross-project coordination topic and you'll see that's actually the
> > name for the [all] tag.
>
> Gah!  I shoudl have clicked all the links.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Yours Tony.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160923/f9249b12/attachment.html>