Open Stack

Vladimir,

as you most likely remember, we've been there already. The previous
fuel-core group has been split especially due to low number of core
reviewers, too big load on them and inflexibility in promoting valuable
contributors into the group. Worth noting that it was very welcome change.

I fail to see why do you want to revert it after 12 months since it was
dissolved. I will just leave the excellent Mike's message here[1].

Cheers,
Bartłomiej

[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/072406.html

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin <sbogatkin at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I see one big problem here - people who have expert skills in one area
> (for example, in fuel-library puppet manifests and their logic) will have
> ability to set +2 and workflow +1 to reviews in other areas (for example,
> in fuel-astute) where they don't have good expertise. It can lead to errors
> increase and tests failures.
>
> Also I don't feel any problems with core reviewers today (in fuel-library
> at least). If someone think that patches are merged too slow - let's just
> introduce new cores to corresponding teams, we have many great guys who
> will be glad to do this work. A burden of one's own choice is not felt, you
> know )
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
> vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I'd like to suggest to use common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects
>> instead of having separate independent 'by-project' core groups like
>> 'fuel-astute-core' or 'fuel-agent-core'.
>>
>> Pros:
>> 1) It will be easier to access core members (timezone and holiday
>> tolerance)
>> 2) It will be easier to manage single core group (promote new members,
>> remove not active members)
>>
>> Cons:
>> 1) Less of flexibility. Permissions will be the same for all core
>> reviewers in all Fuel projects.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> with best regards,
> Stan.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160905/8a38fdd7/attachment.html>