[openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

Dmitry Tantsur dtantsur at redhat.com
Wed Oct 12 14:09:28 UTC 2016


On 10/12/2016 04:02 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I'd like to propose a plan on how to simultaneously extend the coverage of
>> our jobs and reduce their number.
>>
>> Currently, we're running one instance per job. This was reasonable when the
>> coreos-based IPA image was the default, but now with tinyipa we can run up
>> to 7 instances (and actually do it in the grenade job). I suggest we use 6
>> fake bm nodes to make a single CI job cover many scenarios.
>>
>> The jobs will be grouped based on driver (pxe_ipmitool and agent_ipmitool)
>> to be more in sync with how 3rd party CI does it. A special configuration
>> option will be used to enable multi-instance testing to avoid breaking 3rd
>> party CI systems that are not ready for it.
>>
>> To ensure coverage, we'll only leave a required number of nodes "available",
>> and deploy all instances in parallel.
>>
>> In the end, we'll have these jobs on ironic:
>> gate-tempest-ironic-pxe_ipmitool-tinyipa
>> gate-tempest-ironic-agent_ipmitool-tinyipa
>>
>> Each job will cover the following scenarious:
>> * partition images:
>> ** with local boot:
>> ** 1. msdos partition table and BIOS boot
>> ** 2. GPT partition table and BIOS boot
>> ** 3. GPT partition table and UEFI boot  <*>
>> ** with netboot:
>> ** 4. msdos partition table and BIOS boot <**>
>> * whole disk images:
>> * 5. with msdos partition table embedded and BIOS boot
>> * 6. with GPT partition table embedded and UEFI boot  <*>
>>
>>  <*> - in the future, when we figure our UEFI testing
>>  <**> - we're moving away from defaulting to netboot, hence only one
>> scenario
>>
>> I suggest creating the jobs for Newton and Ocata, and starting with Xenial
>> right away.
>
> +1, huge fan of this.
>
> One more thing to think about - our API tests create and delete nodes.
> If you run
> tempest in parallel, Nova may schedule to these nodes. Might be worth breaking
> API tests out into a separate job, and making these jobs scenario tests only.

I'd prefer to move API tests to functional testing, but yeah, as a first step we 
can split these jobs.

>
> // jim
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list