[openstack-dev] [all][stable] Moving stable/mitaka to Phase-II and liberty to Phase-III

Jim Rollenhagen jim at jimrollenhagen.com
Tue Oct 11 11:18:45 UTC 2016


On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 11:34 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>
>>> I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the
>>> switch;
>>> so that it’s clear which phase a release followed.
>>
>>
>> I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though.  I didn't
>> state
>> this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the
>> stable:follows-policy
>> tag and ask them to release.  I suppose I could go one step further and
>> propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over
>> reach to me.
>>
>> What do PTLs / stable CPLs think?
>
>
> +1 to the idea.
>
> I see that many Ironic projects only have global requirements updates since
> the last release. Should we request a release as well?

Yeah, I think it's worth a release so we can get those packaged up with the
correct dependencies.

// jim



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list