[openstack-dev] [all][stable] Moving stable/mitaka to Phase-II and liberty to Phase-III

Dmitry Tantsur dtantsur at redhat.com
Tue Oct 11 10:43:22 UTC 2016


On 10/10/2016 11:34 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch;
>> so that it’s clear which phase a release followed.
>
> I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though.  I didn't state
> this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the stable:follows-policy
> tag and ask them to release.  I suppose I could go one step further and
> propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over
> reach to me.
>
> What do PTLs / stable CPLs think?

+1 to the idea.

I see that many Ironic projects only have global requirements updates since the 
last release. Should we request a release as well?

>
> BTW: I see you've done this for neutron :)   Thanks!
>
> Yours Tony.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list