Open Stack

On Oct 10, 2016 4:35 PM, "Tony Breeds" <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the
switch;
> > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed.
>
> I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though.  I didn't
state
> this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the
stable:follows-policy
> tag and ask them to release.  I suppose I could go one step further and
> propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over
> reach to me.

I think it's a good idea for us to do it. I'm not sure you need more things
to do in a day, Tony. That said, I've had a hard time getting candidates
for back ports for Glance so it may not be a very interesting release (a
good thing obviously).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161010/3ce12a2d/attachment.html>