Open Stack

On 7 October 2016 at 19:53, Clint Byrum <clint at fewbar.com> wrote:

>
> My hope was that it would be "the summit without the noise". Sounds like
> it will be "the summit without the noise, or the organization".
>
> I'd really like to see time boxes for most if not all of it, even if many
> of the boxes are just half a day of "work time" which means "we want to
> work on stuff together without the overhead of less involved participants."
>
> The two days of cross project is awesome. But there are also big
> single-project initiatives that have cross-project interest anyway.
>
> For instance, the movement of the scheduler out of Nova is most definitely
> a Nova session, but it has ramifications for oslo, performance, neutron,
> cinder, architecture, API-WG, etc.  etc. If we don't know when Nova is
> going to discuss it, how can we be there to influence that discussion?


I've got to agree entirely here. I am mostly interested in cinder stuff,
but I've interest and a stake in specific nova and glance topics... getting
involved in those is going to be impossible without some sort of schedule.

-- 
Duncan Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161010/c8688093/attachment.html>