[openstack-dev] [release][ansible][fuel][kolla][puppet][tripleo] proposed deadlines for cycle-trailing projects

Steven Dake (stdake) stdake at cisco.com
Fri Oct 7 20:39:04 UTC 2016


Doug,

We have already tagged rc1 long ago, but ack on rc2 (we are targeting 12th at present) and ack on 20th for retag of  final rc.  We expect our rc2 to be final.

If there are critical bugs that make the release doa in some way (such as upgrades, reconfigure etc), we will obviously have to tag an rc3 to then retag that as final.  I don’t expect that to happen but it is a possibility.

Regards
-steve


From: Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 12:16 PM
To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [release][ansible][fuel][kolla][puppet][tripleo] proposed deadlines for cycle-trailing projects

This week we tagged the final releases for projects using the
cycle-with-milestones release model. Projects using the cycle-trailing
model have two more weeks before their final release tags are due. In
the time between now and then, we expect those projects to be preparing
and tagging release candidates.

Just as with the milestone-based projects, we want to manage the number,
frequency, and timing of release candidates for cycle-trailing projects.
With that in mind, I would like to propose the following rough timeline
(my apologies for not preparing this sooner):

10 Oct -- All cycle-trailing projects tag at least their first RC.
13 Oct -- Soft deadline for cycle-trailing projects to tag a final RC.
18 Oct -- Hard deadline for cycle-trailing projects to tag a final RC.
20 Oct -- Re-tag the final RCs as a final release.

Between the first and later release candidates, any translations and
bug fixes should be merged.

We want to leave a few days between the last release candidate and
the final release so that downstream consumers of the projects can
report issues against stable artifacts. Given the nature of most
of our trailing projects, and the lateness of starting to discuss
these deadlines, I don't think we need the same amount of time as
we usually set aside for the milestone-based projects. Based on
that assumption, I've proposed a 1 week soft goal and a 2 day hard
deadline.

Let me know what you think,
Doug

Newton schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161007/02e3f5b0/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list