Open Stack

> On 4 Oct 2016, at 17:36, Chris Dent <cdent+os at anticdent.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
> 
>> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
>> during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
>> starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer
>> API.
> 
> No surprise, as I've been saying this for a long time, but yeah, I think
> the API and storage should be deprecated. I think at some of the mid-
> cycles and summits we've had discussions about the parts of ceilometer
> that should be preserved, including any pollsters for which a
> notification does not or cannot exist.
> 
> The data gathering (and to some extent transforming) parts are the only
> parts of ceilometer that are particularly unique so it would be good
> for those to be preserved.
> 
> 

What would be the impact for Heat users who are using the Ceilometer scaling in their templates?

Tim

> -- 
> Chris Dent               ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)        https://anticdent.org/
> freenode: cdent                                         tw: @anticdent__________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev