Sounds good to me ☺ From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+zte at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 10:43 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [ALU] [openstack-dev] [vitrage] common vs utils Currently, we have `common/utils.py`, `common/file_utils.py` and an empty module `utils` in `vitrage`. In my understanding, `common` means common to vitrage package and utils are more general purpose utility functions. Would it better that we move `utils.py`, `file_utils.py` and `datetime_utils.py` to `utils`? -- Yujun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161128/0aacff11/attachment.html>