[openstack-dev] [neutron] OVO support

Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo majopela at redhat.com
Tue Nov 15 09:46:56 UTC 2016


I could be wrong, but I suspect we're doing it this way to be able to do
changes to several objects atomically, and roll back the transactions if at
some point in time what we're trying to accomplish is not possible.

Thoughts?

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It seems like a lot of the object work is being done under database
> transactions. My understanding is that the objects should take care of this
> internally.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks
>
> Gary
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161115/e84145c4/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list