[openstack-dev] [nova] ocata summit unconference session recap

Matt Riedemann mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Nov 4 21:34:16 UTC 2016


We had a single unconference session this time at the Ocata summit. The 
full etherpad is here:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-nova-summit-unconference

We spent most of the session talking about three newly proposed virt 
drivers.

IBM PowerVM
-----------

The PowerVM driver has been getting developed out of the nova tree but 
in the openstack namespace for a couple of years now. The team working 
on it has been attending summits and meetups providing status and 
working on CI. There are some users. There is a spec proposed:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381772/

to start adding in some of the minimum required functionality for an 
in-tree driver and start running the PowerVM CI on Nova changes.

There was quite a bit of discussion in the room about the driver, like 
whether or not it requires cinder/neutron plugins (it doesn't), but 
ultimately there was general agreement on the plan to ease the driver in 
and iterate on adding feature parity from the out of tree driver to nova 
in later releases.

IBM zDPM
--------

This was more socializing the driver and Q&A about it. There is no code 
so nothing really to talk about getting in tree. There was a note that 
it takes 10 minutes to create a server, which raised some questions.

The direction here was basically follow the PowerVM driver model, which 
is work on the driver in the open, work on CI, work on customers, and 
attend developer events / stay involved in the Nova community to provide 
updates on status.

Huawei FusionCompute
--------------------

This is a driver that Huawei has had for their FusionSphere product, 
since around the Folsom release. The code has been made available on 
github. It requires a cinder driver but not a neutron ML2 plugin.

The general feeling on this driver was it's not a good fit for Nova 
given it's an abstraction to an entire other virtualization management 
system, sort of like vCenter or PowerVC. That kind of architecture 
raises issues with resource tracking and state management and while yes 
the vCenter driver is in nova, the architecture it relies on has been 
problematic and we don't really want to make the same mistake with more 
virt drivers.

There was some feedback on the other side of this to the effect that if 
there are customers / users of the FusionCompute driver, why would we 
not allow it into Nova - and if there are limitations with it then it's 
up to the vendor to deal with them, or the users to have to live with 
them. This is a debate that isn't likely to go away anytime soon given 
the platform9/omni demo at the summit which is essentially a virt driver 
for AWS.

So while it doesn't look probable for this driver to get into Nova, at 
least anytime soon, it is in Huawei's best interest to develop the 
driver in the open and work on CI.

Generalize PCI device as Host device
------------------------------------

This was a spec mentioned during the session:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385810/

The intent is to generalize host PCI devices are modeled in Nova so that 
new types can be built into that model for new support, like for vGPUs.

There wasn't a lot of discussion on this during the session, and not all 
of the best people to weigh in on this were in the room, so the 
direction was to move discussion to the spec and get the 
SR-IOV/PCI/resource provider people like lbeliveau, jaypipes and moshele 
to review the spec.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list