[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

Jim Rollenhagen jim at jimrollenhagen.com
Thu May 26 11:30:39 UTC 2016


On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Armando M. wrote:
> On 24 May 2016 at 04:51, Jim Rollenhagen <jim at jimrollenhagen.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in
> > the near future. Are there any solid plans for that?
> >
> 
> Who spreads these rumors :)?
> 
> To the best of my knowledge I have not seen any RFE proposed recently along
> these lines.

Thanks Armando. Long live portgroups :)

// jim

> 
> 
> > For context, as part of the multitenant networking work, ironic has a
> > portgroup concept proposed, where operators can configure bonding for
> > NICs in a baremetal machine. There are ML2 drivers that support this
> > model and will configure a bond.
> >
> > Some folks have concerns about landing this code if Neutron is going to
> > support bonding as a first-class citizen. So before we delay any
> > further, I'd like to find out if there's any truth to this, and what the
> > timeline for that might look like.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > // jim
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >

> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list