[openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"
davanum at gmail.com
Tue May 24 11:29:53 UTC 2016
+10000 ttx. ("I'd prefer if we didn't have to special-case anyone")
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>> [...] If we are accepting golang, I want it to be clearly
>> documented that the expectation is it is used exclusively where there is
>> a demonstrable case (such as with swift) and not a carte blanche to use
>> it wherever-you-please.
>> I want this to be a social contract looked at and enforced by the
>> community, not special permissions that are granted by the TC (I don't
>> want the TC to need to step in an approve every single use case of
>> special permissions or inclusion (see reasons for the dissolution of the
>> "integrated release").
>> This isn't strictly an all or nothing case, this is a "how would we
>> enforce this?" type deal. Lean on infra to enforce that only projects
>> with the golang-is-ok-here tag are allowed to use it? I don't want
>> would like to see most of the work continue with python as the primary
>> language. I just think it's unreasonable to lock tools behind a gate
>> that is stronger than the social / community contract (and outlined in
>> the resolution including X language).
> I'd prefer if we didn't have to special-case anyone, and we could come up
> with general rules that every OpenStack project follows. Any other solution
> is an administrative nightmare and a source of tension between projects (why
> are they special and not me).
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
More information about the OpenStack-dev