[openstack-dev] [cross-project][infra][keystone] Moving towards a Identity v3-only on Devstack - Next Steps
raildom at gmail.com
Thu May 12 18:26:49 UTC 2016
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:19 PM Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 01:47 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> > This also comes back to the conversation at the summit. We need to
> > propose the timeline to turn over for V3 (regardless of
> > voting/non-voting today) so that it is possible to set the timeline that
> > is expected for everything to get fixed (and where we are
> > expecting/planning to stop reverting while focusing on fixing the
> > v3-only changes).
> > I am going to ask the Keystone team to set forth the timeline and commit
> > to getting the pieces in order so that we can make v3-only voting rather
> > than playing the propose/revert game we're currently doing. A proposed
> > timeline and gameplan will only help at this point.
> A timeline would be good (proposed below), but there are also other bits
> of the approach we should consider.
> I would expect, for instance,
> gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-identity-v3-only-full to be on keystone, and
> it does not appear to be. Is there a reason why?
We made this here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/311169/
> With that on keystone, devstack-gate, devstack, tempest the integrated
> space should be pretty well covered. There really is no need to also go
> stick this on glance, nova, cinder, neutron, swift I don't think,
> because they only really use keystone through pretty defined interfaces.
> Then some strategic use of nv jobs on things we know would have some
> additional interactions here (because we know they are currently broken
> or they do interesting things) like ironic, heat, trove, would probably
> be pretty useful.
> That starts building up the list of known breaks the keystone folks are
> tracking, which should get a drum beat every week in email about
> outstanding issues, and issues fixed.
++ Sounds a good Idea, I'll work to make this happen.
> The goal of gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-identity-v3-only-full should not
> be for that to be voting, ever. It should be to use that as a good
> indicator that changing the default in devstack (and thus in the
> majority of upstream jobs) to not ever enable v2.
We intend use this job as a indicator to find bugs related to this, but the
idea to make this gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-identity-v3-only-full voting is
make sure that anyone are sending anything v3 incompatible.
Because of how v3 support exists in projects (largely hidden behind
> keystoneauth), it is really unlikely to rando regress once fixed. There
> just aren't that many knobs a project has that would make that happen.
> So I think we can make forward progress without a voting backstop until
> we get to a point where we can just throw the big red switch (with
> warning) on a Monday (probably early in the Otaca cycle) and say there
> you go. It's now the project job to handle it. And they'll all get fair
> warning for the month prior to the big red switch.
> Sean Dague
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev