[openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration
mspreitz at us.ibm.com
Mon May 9 20:45:06 UTC 2016
"Hayes, Graham" <graham.hayes at hpe.com> wrote on 05/09/2016 04:08:07 PM:
> On 09/05/2016 20:55, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> > Oh, right, the network gets to specify the rest of the FQDN. In my
> > I am interested in Neutron Ports on tenant networks. So with a
> > "hostname" (first label) and per-network "domain" (rest of the
> > I would get separation between tenants --- at least in the sense that
> > there is no overlap in FQDNs. Will this work for private tenant
> Yes, you could publish the records to Designate for this, or using the
> internal dns resolution side of the integration.
> Pushing the records to designate would make them viewable globally
> (anywhere the DNS servers are accessible)
> > The other part of separation is that I do not want one tenant to even
> > able to look up FQDNs that belong to another tenant. Is this
> > prohibition possible today? If not, is anyone else interested in it?
> Do you want to limit this to inside the tenant private network? if so,
> just allowing users to set the dns_domain on a network, and not enabling
> the external DNS plugin will work fine.
Ah, that may be what I want. BTW, I am not planning to use Nova. I am
planning to use Swarm and Kubernetes to create containers attached to
Neutron private tenant networks. What DNS server would I configure those
containers to use?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev