Open Stack

I think several of the people who have expressed support of split repo have given the caveat that they want it integrated once it matures.  I know that merging repos at a future date without losing history is a major drawback to this approach.  What if instead of separate repo, we just had a "k8s" branch with periodic (weekly?) syncs from master?  That would allow easy merge of git history at the point that k8s meats the "stable" requirement.  Would having a separate branch in the same repo give the kolla-k8s-core the independence desired for quick development without infringing on master?  Is it possible in gerrit for kolla-k8s-core have +2 on k8s branch and not master?  Just food for thought.

Thx,
britt




On 5/2/16, 1:32 AM, "Swapnil Kulkarni" <me at coolsvap.net> wrote:

>On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Britt Houser (bhouser)
><bhouser at cisco.com> wrote:
>> Although it seems I'm in the minority, I am in favor of unified repo.
>>
>> From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" <stdake at cisco.com>
>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Date: Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 5:03 PM
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] One repo vs two
>>
>> Ryan had rightly pointed out that when we made the original proposal 9am
>> morning we had asked folks if they wanted to participate in a separate
>> repository.
>>
>> I don't think a separate repository is the correct approach based upon one
>> off private conversations with folks at summit.  Many people from that list
>> approached me and indicated they would like to see the work integrated in
>> one repository as outlined in my vote proposal email.  The reasons I heard
>> were:
>>
>> Better integration of the community
>> Better integration of the code base
>> Doesn't present an us vs them mentality that one could argue happened during
>> kolla-mesos
>> A second repository makes k8s a second class citizen deployment architecture
>> without a voice in the full deployment methodology
>> Two gating methods versus one
>> No going back to a unified repository while preserving git history
>>
>> I favor of the separate repositories I heard
>>
>> It presents a unified workspace for kubernetes alone
>> Packaging without ansible is simpler as the ansible directory need not be
>> deleted
>>
>> There were other complaints but not many pros.  Unfortunately I failed to
>> communicate these complaints to the core team prior to the vote, so now is
>> the time for fixing that.
>>
>> I'll leave it open to the new folks that want to do the work if they want to
>> work on an offshoot repository and open us up to the possible problems
>> above.
>>
>> If you are on this list:
>>
>> Ryan Hallisey
>> Britt Houser
>>
>> mark casey
>>
>> Steven Dake (delta-alpha-kilo-echo)
>>
>> Michael Schmidt
>>
>> Marian Schwarz
>>
>> Andrew Battye
>>
>> Kevin Fox (kfox1111)
>>
>> Sidharth Surana (ssurana)
>>
>>  Michal Rostecki (mrostecki)
>>
>>   Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap)
>>
>>   MD NADEEM (mail2nadeem92)
>>
>>   Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)
>>
>>   Jeff Peeler (jpeeler)
>>
>>   Martin Andre (mandre)
>>
>>   Ian Main (Slower)
>>
>> Hui Kang (huikang)
>>
>> Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk)
>>
>> Alex Polvi (polvi)
>>
>> Rob Mason
>>
>> Alicja Kwasniewska
>>
>> sean mooney (sean-k-mooney)
>>
>> Keith Byrne (kbyrne)
>>
>> Zdenek Janda (xdeu)
>>
>> Brandon Jozsa (v1k0d3n)
>>
>> Rajath Agasthya (rajathagasthya)
>> Jinay Vora
>> Hui Kang
>> Davanum Srinivas
>>
>>
>>
>> Please speak up if you are in favor of a separate repository or a unified
>> repository.
>>
>> The core reviewers will still take responsibility for determining if we
>> proceed on the action of implementing kubernetes in general.
>>
>> Thank you
>> -steve
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>I am in the favor of having two separate repos and evaluating the
>merge/split option later.
>Though in the longer run, I would recommend having a single repo with
>multiple stable deployment tools(maybe too early to comment views but
>yeah)
>
>Swapnil
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev