[openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution

Hayes, Graham graham.hayes at hpe.com
Tue Mar 15 20:35:23 UTC 2016


On 15/03/2016 20:29, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/15/2016 08:22 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> However, at the risk of sounding like a humorless automaton, we have a valid
>> candidate.
>>   * Monty Taylor for Packaging-Deb PTL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292690/
>
> This started as a joke. Please don't pick-up the joke, and make it a
> serious proposal. This isn't funny anymore.
>
> Obviously, Monty isn't interested (otherwise, he would have help with
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264726/, which he didn't despite his
> generous offer to do so in Tokyo but he had other priorities).
>
> Also again, please have a look at the openstack-pkg-tools Git history here:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-pkg-tools.git/
>
> There's at least 3 commits a week on this repository.
>
> Now, compare this to the single commit to add a .gitreview file from Monty:
> https://github.com/openstack/deb-openstack-pkg-tools/commits/debian/liberty
>
> That's also a commit on the Liberty branch, and we've switched to
> debian/mitaka a long time ago.
>
>> Also by the rules I feel like we have no choice but to reject
>>   * Adding Packaging-Deb/Thomas_Goirand.txt
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292885/
>
> I know we have established governance rules. They exist for a reason.
> Though I hope everyone understand what happened after my explanation.
>
> I believe what you wanted to write is:
>
> "If we don't think first and follow the rules without even trying to
> understand, we *WOULD* reject. But we are humans with brains, not
> machines, therefore, it's ok"
>
> Because *you do* have a choice, don't you?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

Does the current PTL not have the ability to propose extra-atc's for
this reason?

Would a solution be for zigo to propose the people active in
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-pkg-tools.git/
to the governance repo (including himself) and the TC approve it.

This would give an electorate, and give Zigo the right to run as PTL.

I know the timescales would be short - but it might be workable.

- Graham



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list