Open Stack

Dear all,

Thank you for the opinions about this problem.

I would agree with Roman, that it is always better to reuse solutions than
re-inventing the wheel. We should investigate possibility of using
ironic-inspector and integrating it into fuel.

Best regards,
Alexander Saprykin

2016-03-15 13:03 GMT+01:00 Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com>:

> My strong +1 to drop off nailgun-agent completely in favour of
> ironic-inspector. Even taking into consideration we'lll need to
> extend  ironic-inspector for fuel needs.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergii Golovatiuk,
> Skype #golserge
> IRC #holser
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko <me at romcheg.me>
> wrote:
>
>> My opition on this is that we have too many re-invented wheels in Fuel
>> and it’s better think about replacing them with something we can re-use
>> than re-inventing them one more time.
>>
>> Let’s take a look at Ironic and try to figure out how we can use its
>> features for the same purpose.
>>
>>
>> - romcheg
>> > 15 бер. 2016 р. о 10:38 Neil Jerram <Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com>
>> написав(ла):
>> >
>> > On 15/03/16 07:11, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
>> >> Alexander,
>> >>
>> >> We have many other places where use Ruby (astute, puppet custom types,
>> >> etc.). I don't think it is a good reason to re-write something just
>> >> because it is written in Ruby. You are right about tests, about
>> plugins,
>> >> but let's look around. Ironic community has already invented discovery
>> >> component (btw written in python) and I can't see any reason why we
>> >> should continue putting efforts in nailgun agent and not try to switch
>> >> to ironic-inspector.
>> >
>> > +1 in general terms.  It's strange to me that there are so many
>> > OpenStack deployment systems that each do each piece of the puzzle in
>> > their own way (Fuel, Foreman, MAAS/Juju etc.) - and which also means
>> > that I need substantial separate learning in order to use all these
>> > systems.  It would be great to see some consolidation.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >       Neil
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160315/12a55d10/attachment.html>