[openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Use packetary for building ISO

Aleksey Zvyagintsev azvyagintsev at mirantis.com
Thu Mar 3 11:14:50 UTC 2016


Hello team's ,
Please take in mind my HUGE +1
We really need to remove package building process from iso build flow.



On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> I think everything will be ready by Wednesday 03/09/2016. We have just
> fixed one critical bug in Packetary, now it seems working.
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Andrew Maksimov <amaksimov at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> Till what date do you want FFE ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrey Maximov
>> Fuel Project Manager
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
>> vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>
>>> I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for "Use packetary for
>>> building ISO". BP [0]
>>>
>>> There is PR in packetary itself [1]. And one pull request in fuel-main
>>> [2].
>>>
>>> For ISO build process this feature means we will use the same command
>>> 'make iso' but another set of environment variables.
>>>
>>> This change is going to make ISO build process fully data driven (yaml).
>>> It will allow us to build ISO with various sets of repositories (upstream
>>> fuel repo, custom repos, etc.) Also it is going to make ISO build process
>>> even faster (about 5 minutes).
>>>
>>> Risk to affect other teams is medium. Merge plan is as follows:
>>>
>>> 1) We will create a parallel ISO build job with new set of variables
>>> and make it use fuel-main request (not merging it)
>>> 2) We will run this job for couple of days and run smoke and BVT tests
>>> 3) Once everything is ready and working we will merge fuel-main patch
>>> and declare this new job as our product ISO job
>>> 4) We will create custom jobs with this new set of variables
>>>
>>> [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/use-packetary-in-fuel
>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286576
>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283976
>>>
>>>
>>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
---
Best regards,
   Aleksey Zvyagintsev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160303/eb0775ff/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list