Open Stack

+1.

But I do not think we should necessarily do this before FF.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Ravi, Goutham <Goutham.Ravi at netapp.com>
wrote:

> Hi Manila community,
>
> This is regarding the "bug":
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-manilaclient/+bug/1457155 in the
> python-manilaclient.
> A commit was made for this and it merged yesterday:
> https://github.com/openstack/python-manilaclient/commit/37f2e50bd433149b893d30a478947f3e17f928e9
>  ( <https://review.openstack.org/264110>https:/
> <https://review.openstack.org/264110>/review.
> <https://review.openstack.org/264110>openstack.
> <https://review.openstack.org/264110>org/264110
> <https://review.openstack.org/264110>)
>
> I disagree with the approach in this patch. I feel this bug is invalid.
> Deployers have a way to modify policies in "policy.json" as with any other
> OpenStack project. It would be extremely confusing to see this "Admin Only"
> added to certain commands that *we* think will be "admin only" (as
> defined in the "default" policy.json). Essentially, ANY API we build can be
> exposed to the user (or some users); or administrators; as determined by
> the deployer.
>
> IMHO, assuming that policies can change, we shouldn't hard code "admin
> only" as help text. Allow the manila-api service  to respond to a request
> with a  403 if it deems fit; it can see the policy file and works with it.
> That's correct behavior, as is.
>
> I feel we should revert this change in Mitaka before the feature freeze.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Goutham
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Rodrigo Barbieri
Computer Scientist
OpenStack Manila Contributor
Federal University of São Carlos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160302/9f3042b2/attachment.html>