Open Stack

Quick question: why do we need the service type or name in there? You
really should know what API you're talking to already and it's just
something that makes it more difficult to handle all the different APIs in
a common way.
On Jun 18, 2016 8:25 PM, "Steve Martinelli" <s.martinelli at gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks like Manila is using the service name instead of type
> (X-OpenStack-Manila-API-Version) according to this link anyway:
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/manila/devref/api_microversion_dev.html
>
> Keystone can follow the cross project spec and use the service type
> (Identity instead of Keystone).
> On Jun 17, 2016 12:44 PM, "Ed Leafe" <ed at leafe.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Henry Nash <henrynash9 at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> > We are currently in the process of implementing microversion support in
>> keystone - and are obviously trying to follow the cross-projec spec for
>> this (
>> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/microversion_specification.html
>> ).
>> >
>> > One thing I noticed was that the header specified in this spec is of
>> the form:
>> >
>> > OpenStack-API-Version: [SERVICE_TYPE] [X,Y]
>> >
>> > for example:
>> >
>> > OpenStack-API-Version: identity 3.7
>> >
>> > However, from what i can see of the current implementations I have seen
>> of microversioning in OpenStack (Nova, Manilla), they use service-specific
>> headers, e.g.
>> >
>> > X-OpenStack-Nova-API-Version: 2.12
>> >
>> > My question is whether there a plan to converge on the generalized
>> header format….or are we keep with the service-specific headers? I’d
>> obviously like to implement the correct one for keystone.
>>
>> Yes, the plan is to converge on the more generic headers. The Nova
>> headers (don’t know about Manilla) pre-date the API WG spec, and were the
>> motivation for development of that spec. We’ve even made it possible to
>> accept both header formats [0] until things can be migrated to the
>> recommended format.
>>
>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300077/
>>
>> -- Ed Leafe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160618/685d588a/attachment.html>