Open Stack

On 6/15/2016 3:10 PM, Paul Michali wrote:
> Is the plan to back port that change to Mitaka?
>
> Thanks,
>
> PCM
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:31 PM Matt Riedemann
> <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 6/14/2016 3:09 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>     >
>     > Yes. Code merged recently from Sahid does this:
>     >
>     > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277422/
>     >
>     > Best,
>     > -jay
>     >
>
>     That was actually reverted out of mitaka:
>
>     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292290/
>
>     The feature change that got into newton was this:
>
>     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292499/
>
>     Which was busted, and required:
>
>     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324379/
>
>     Well, required as long as you want your compute service to start. :)
>
>     And no, we aren't backporting these, especially to liberty which is
>     security / critical fix mode only now.
>
>     --
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Matt Riedemann
>
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

No, it's really a feature.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann