[openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA, huge pages, and scheduling

Jay Pipes jaypipes at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 17:05:22 UTC 2016


There have been a number of bug fixes to the NUMA code in both Mitaka 
and Newton. I think you would need to be very careful in your backporting :)

-jay

On 06/15/2016 09:55 AM, Paul Michali wrote:
> Yeah, was thinking more of technically vs policy. Wondering if there are
> other dependencies or if I could patch this into a Liberty code base.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com
> <mailto:jaypipes at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 06/15/2016 03:58 AM, Paul Michali wrote:
>      > Awesome Jay!
>      >
>      > Do you think this is something that can be backporting to Liberty w/o
>      > other dependencies? We're running Liberty on our system right now.
>
>     Doubtful, Paul :( The policy for upstream is not to backport feature
>     patches. This would be something you would need to do yourself -- i.e.
>     keep patch technical debt for whichever distribution of OpenStack you
>     are using (or sources if you're going that route).
>
>     Best,
>     -jay
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list