Open Stack

Hi,

I just fixed up Timofei's BP.
I went through all the specs and spotted another 5 or 6 that were out of sync.
There may well be others I didn't spot.

Thanks,
johnthetubaguy

On 14 June 2016 at 09:17, Timofei Durakov <tdurakov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-compute-compute-communication
> - bp is not approved, but the spec is.
>
> Timofey
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:47 AM, joehuang <joehuang at huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Matt,
>>
>> Thank you for the clarification.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:07 AM
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved
>> spec but unapproved blueprint
>>
>> On 6/12/2016 7:48 PM, joehuang wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > This spec is not approved yet:
>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295595/
>> >
>> > But the BP is approved:
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/expose-quiesce-unquiesce-a
>> > pi
>> >
>> > Don't know how to deal with the spec now. Is this spec killed? Should
>> > Nova support application level consistency snapshot for disaster recovery
>> > purpose or not?
>> >
>> > Best Regards
>> > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
>> > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 9:08 PM
>> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved
>> > spec but unapproved blueprint
>> >
>> > I've come across several changes up for review that are tied to Newton
>> > blueprints which have specs approved but the blueprints in launchpad are not
>> > yet approved.
>> >
>> > If you have a spec that was approved for Newton but your blueprint in
>> > launchpad isn't approved yet, please ping me (mriedem) in IRC or reply to
>> > this thread to get it approved and tracked for the Newton release.
>> > It's important (at least to me) that we have an accurate representation
>> > of how much work we're trying to get done this release, especially with
>> > non-priority feature freeze coming up in three weeks.
>> >
>>
>> Neither the spec nor the blueprint is approved. The blueprint was
>> previously approved in mitaka but is not for newton, with reasons in the
>> spec review for newton.
>>
>> At this point we're past non-priority spec approval freeze so this isn't
>> going to get in for newton. There are a lot of concerns about this one so
>> it's going to be tabled for at least this release, we can revisit in ocata,
>> but it adds a lot of complexity and it's more than we're willing to take on
>> right now given everything else planned for this release.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt Riedemann
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>