[openstack-dev] [octavia][neutron] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/octavia failed

Ihar Hrachyshka ihrachys at redhat.com
Tue Jun 7 08:37:51 UTC 2016


Right, the fix is two-fold:

1. constraint gate with upper-constraints (done for both stable branches);
2. exclude Flask 0.11 from global-requirements.txt (landed in stable/mitaka, landing in stable/liberty);
3. once ^ is merged, sync exclusion into octavia (landed in stable/mitaka; waiting for stable/liberty);
4. fix breakage with Flask 0.11 (landed in stable/mitaka, stable/liberty in progress).

We experience a problem in stable/liberty landing a fix for Flask 0.11 (point 4. above):

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324312/1

That seems to be unrelated to Flask issue, but is a backwards incompatible change in taskflow 1.32.0+ that broke unit tests for Octavia. I reported a bug against taskflow:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/taskflow/+bug/1589848

Ihar

> On 06 Jun 2016, at 20:59, Michael Johnson <johnsomor at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> We are aware of the issue and have cherry picked patches pending
> review by the neutron stable team:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/openstack/octavia+status:open+branch:stable/mitaka
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/openstack/octavia+status:open+branch:stable/liberty
> 
> Michael
> 
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Matt Riedemann
> <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Can someone from the Octavia team check on the stable/liberty failures for
>> the unit test runs?  Those have been failing for several weeks, if not
>> months, now, which makes having a job run Octavia unit tests on the
>> periodic-stable queue pointless since they never pass.
>> 
>> Keep in mind the octavia repo has the stable:follows-policy tag in the
>> governance repo [1] and part of that tag being applied to the project is
>> actually maintaining the stable branches, which includes keeping the CI jobs
>> running.
>> 
>> [1]
>> https://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/neutron.html#project-neutron
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/octavia failed
>> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 06:23:15 +0000
>> From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports.
>> <openstack-stable-maint at lists.openstack.org>
>> Reply-To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> To: openstack-stable-maint at lists.openstack.org
>> 
>> Build failed.
>> 
>> - periodic-octavia-docs-liberty
>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-octavia-docs-liberty/9796536/
>> : SUCCESS in 3m 01s
>> - periodic-octavia-python27-liberty
>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-octavia-python27-liberty/6d96415/
>> : FAILURE in 4m 36s
>> - periodic-octavia-docs-mitaka
>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-octavia-docs-mitaka/b2074b4/
>> : SUCCESS in 3m 36s
>> - periodic-octavia-python27-mitaka
>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-octavia-python27-mitaka/f220954/
>> : SUCCESS in 3m 59s
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-stable-maint mailing list
>> Openstack-stable-maint at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list