[openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

Jim Rollenhagen jim at jimrollenhagen.com
Tue Jul 26 22:28:18 UTC 2016


On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:42:10PM +0000, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/26/16, 2:13 PM, "Jim Rollenhagen" <jim at jimrollenhagen.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 08:36:01PM +0000, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> >> Dims,
> >> 
> >> The project-config addition was debated by Andreas before this
> >>partnership
> >> in this press release was announced and the full intent of the project
> >>was
> >> understood.  The argument I see used in the review  is that since
> >>fuel-ccp
> >> not part of Newton, it doesn't need to be in the projects.yaml file.
> >> Given the intent of the project is obvious (to me) from the press
> >>release
> >> to join the big tent, my two requests still apply.  At present this
> >> project may be perceived as "flying under the radar" and further not
> >> following the four opens as I already stated.
> >
> >I'm confused, what specifically is happening that is against the four
> >opens? What part of the press release implies big tent in the future?
> 
> My exact words were proceeded by "may be perceived"

Okay, I'm still confused what part of it may be perceived as not
following the four opens.

> 
> The press release itself implies a big effort with big contributors hence
> big tent.

I guess the big tent means something different to me - that a project is
"one of us" in that they work the same way we do, etc. I don't think
large efforts or large contributor base matter.

> 
> >
> >> 
> >> The two requests were:
> >> 
> >> 1. Please submit the repositories for projects.yaml TC oversight
> >> 2. Please change Fuel's mission statement to match reality of this
> >> announcement 
> >
> >Why? The current mission statement is "To streamline and accelerate the
> >process of deploying, testing and maintaining various configurations of
> >OpenStack at scale." I don't see why anything about this announcement
> >doesn't fit into that mission statement.
> 
> That mission statement doesn't match intent, which is to produce a
> kubernetes deployment of openstack.  I don't feel "various configurations"
> cuts it.

Well, it's unclear to me if Fuel is pivoting completely to Kubernetes or
adding it as an option. That said, I suspect that many configurations
will still be a thing, just that everything runs on Kubernetes.

> 
> But its really up to the Fuel team, not you or I.

Indeed, mostly just curious as your email was pretty strongly worded and
I didn't really understand it.

// jim

> 
> Regards
> -steve
> 
> >
> >// jim
> >
> >> 
> >> Regards
> >> -steve
> >> 
> >> On 7/26/16, 1:18 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Steven,
> >> >
> >> >fyi, This was debated in the project-config review:
> >> >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/335584/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Dims
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Steven Dake (stdake)
> >><stdake at cisco.com>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> Dims,
> >> >>
> >> >> Given the strong language around partnership between Intel, Mirantis,
> >> >>and
> >> >> Google in that press release, and the activity in the review queue (2
> >> >> pages of outstanding reviews) it seems clear to me that the intent is
> >> >>for
> >> >> this part of Fuel to participate in the big tent.  The right thing
> >>to do
> >> >> here is for fuel-ccp to submit their repos to TC oversight by adding
> >> >>them
> >> >> to the official project list.
> >> >>
> >> >> Fuel requires a mission change, or it may be perceived that Fuel
> >>itself
> >> >> does not adhere to the Four Opens [1] specifically Open Development
> >>and
> >> >> Open Community.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >> -steve
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] 
> >> 
> >>>>https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/opens.rst
> >> >>
> >> >> On 7/26/16, 11:15 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>And. it's here in OpenStack:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Look for fuel-ccp-* in http://git.openstack.org/cgit/ or the gerrit
> >> >>>search
> >> 
> >>>>>https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+project:^op
> >>>>>en
> >> >>>st
> >> >>>ack/fuel-ccp.*
> >> >>>
> >> >>>-- Dims
> >> >>>
> >> >>>On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov>
> >> >>>wrote:
> >> >>>> They are starting their own project.
> >> >>>> ________________________________________
> >> >>>> From: Stephen Hindle [shindle at llnw.com]
> >> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:35 AM
> >> >>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> >>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] Looks like Mirantis is
> >>getting
> >> >>>>Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So just saw this:
> >> >>>>
> >> 
> >>>>>>http://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/OpenStack-on-K
> >>>>>>ub
> >> >>>>er
> >> >>>>netes-Mirantis-fuels-Fuel-with-Google-Intel-heat
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Wonder if that means we'll get more devs or maybe some prebuilt
> >> >>>> containers for Kolla?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Stephen Hindle - Senior Systems Engineer
> >> >>>> 480.807.8189 480.807.8189
> >> >>>> www.limelight.com Delivering Faster Better
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Join the conversation
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> at Limelight Connect
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> The information in this message may be confidential.  It is
> >>intended
> >> >>>>solely
> >> >>>> for
> >> >>>> the addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, any
> >> >>>>disclosure,
> >> >>>> copying or distribution of the message, or any action or omission
> >> >>>>taken
> >> >>>>by
> >> >>>> you
> >> >>>> in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please
> >> >>>>immediately
> >> >>>> contact the sender if you have received this message in error.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> 
> >>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>>__
> >> >>>>__
> >> >>>>_
> >> >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> >>>> Unsubscribe:
> >> >>>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> 
> >>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>>__
> >> >>>>__
> >> >>>>_
> >> >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> >>>> Unsubscribe:
> >> >>>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>--
> >> >>>Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
> >> >>>
> >> 
> >>>>>______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>__
> >> >>>__
> >> >>>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> >>>Unsubscribe: 
> >> >>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> >>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 
> >> 
> >>>>_______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>__
> >> >>_
> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> >> Unsubscribe: 
> >> >>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-- 
> >> >Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
> >> >
> >> 
> >>>________________________________________________________________________
> >>>__
> >> >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> >Unsubscribe: 
> >>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>_________________________________________________________________________
> >>_
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe: 
> >>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >__________________________________________________________________________
> >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list