Open Stack

+1 ofc

On 19 July 2016 at 06:02, Ryan Hallisey <rhallise at redhat.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Ryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeffrey Zhang" <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 9:16:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Applying for stable-follows tag
>
> +1 to apply
> I'd like to be the volunteer.
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap)
> <me at coolsvap.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Paul Bourke <paul.bourke at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> +1 to applying. I'll volunteer for the backport team also.
>>>
>>> -Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/07/16 13:07, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Koalians,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like us to consider applying  for the stable follows policy tag.
>>>>   Full details are here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/tags/stable_follows-policy.rst
>>>>
>>>> Because of the magic work we did to make liberty functional, it is
>>>> possible that we may not be able to apply for this tag until Liberty
>>>> falls into EOL.  Still I personally believe intent matters most, and our
>>>> intent has always been for these to be stable low-rate-of-change
>>>> no-feature-backport branches.  There are some exceptions I think we
>>>> would fit under for the Liberty case, so I think it is worth a shot.
>>>>
>>>> I'd need 2-4 people to commit to joining the stable backport team for
>>>> Kolla reviews specifically.  These folks would be the only folks that
>>>> could ACK patches in the stable branch maintenance queue.  Anyone could
>>>> continue to submit backport patches as they desire.
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave voting open for 1 week or until there I a majority (6 core
>>>> reviewers) or until there is a unanimous vote.  If there is not, then we
>>>> won't apply.  The deadline for this vote is July 25th.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> -steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> +1 to apply for stable follows policy.
>> I would like to volunteer for the backport team.
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Jeffrey Zhang
> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev