Open Stack

On Mon, Jul 18 2016, Joshua Harlow wrote:

> Thus why I think the starting of the architecture working group is a good
> thing; because I have a believe that people are forgetting among all of this
> that such a group holds a lot of the keys to the kingdom (whether u, the
> reader, want to admit that or not is well the readers problem) in openstack
> (sorry and no disrespect to independent folks & contributors), but most of us
> work for large companies that have architects (and leads) and if those
> architects (and leads) can get together cross-company to aggregate and (agree
> on) and solve actual problems then that really is IMHO the only way to keep our
> projects healthy (assuming we can even do that at this stage).

I think it is a bit naive to think any working group is going to fix
architectural problems. You know first hand what happened¹ with the Nova
service group and tooz for example.

¹  Nothing.

-- 
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker
// https://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160719/61b5106a/attachment.pgp>