On 7/6/2016 9:37 AM, Timofei Durakov wrote: > Hi, > > there are several patches in a tempest that improves micro > versions coverage for Nova REST API: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337598 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338248 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287605 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338256 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233176 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327191 > > The purpose of this thread is to align our efforts in merging these and > also ask other contributors to join this activity, as it will improve > nova tempest coverage. > > > Timofey. > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Are these all needed in Tempest? We don't need 100% nova microversion REST API coverage in Tempest if there are things that we can test inside nova, like in the functional tests. The only thing we don't have in nova is the response schema validation. For the most part I only ask for a microversion test in Tempest when it requires other services like cinder or neutron, or it hits new behavior in the virt drivers. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann