On 27 January 2016 at 06:40, Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 1/27/2016 11:22 AM, Avishay Traeger wrote: > >> >> I agree with you. Actually, I think it would be more correct to have >> Cinder store it, and not pass it at all to terminate_connection(). >> >> > That would be ideal but I don't know if cinder is storing this information > in the database like nova is in the nova > block_device_mappings.connection_info column. > This is being discussed for cinder, since it is useful for implementing force detach / cleanup in cinder -- Duncan Thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160127/a045a8f4/attachment.html>