On 12/22/2015 12:44 PM, Jason Rist wrote: > On 12/22/2015 04:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input. >> As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into >> Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming >> more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already). >> >> TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar >> attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2] >> >> Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar, >> python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it >> from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements. >> >> I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January if >> there are no objections. >> >> Cheers, >> Dougal >> >> >> [1]: >> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html >> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432 >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > +1 > +1 -- Ryan Brown / Senior Software Engineer, Openstack / Red Hat, Inc.