[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][barbican]TLS container could not be found

Madhusudhan Kandadai madhusudhan.openstack at gmail.com
Mon Feb 29 21:47:49 UTC 2016


Is what I can see the error logs in barbican svc screen while I create TLS
listener like this: http://paste.openstack.org/show/xVl9iuJtGW03fCGetDm3/

2016-02-29 13:42:55.222 INFO barbican.api.middleware.context
[req-65fd0f08-4c1e-4b2f-9cbd-64f186365077 afaa5d797f3543369d05e370a543ef9d
c141e106a7424d1a8316cf03a8c91e40] Processed request: 404 Not Found - POST
http://192.168.109.129:9311/v1/containers/d96dccd5-0d39-4f67-ba3a-366a84cfd371/consumers/
{address space usage: 220770304 bytes/210MB} {rss usage: 101371904
bytes/96MB} [pid: 52558|app: 0|req: 75/75] 192.168.109.129 () {34 vars in
598 bytes} [Mon Feb 29 13:42:55 2016] POST
/v1/containers/d96dccd5-0d39-4f67-ba3a-366a84cfd371/consumers/ => generated
111 bytes in 214 msecs (HTTP/1.1 404) 4 headers in 179 bytes (1 switches on
core 0)
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 ERROR barbican.model.repositories
[req-0554f272-f711-49b7-a1f7-3b8bc87b431b afaa5d797f3543369d05e370a543ef9d
c141e106a7424d1a8316cf03a8c91e40] Not found for
d96dccd5-0d39-4f67-ba3a-366a84cfd371
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 TRACE barbican.model.repositories Traceback (most
recent call last):
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 TRACE barbican.model.repositories   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/model/repositories.py", line 354, in get
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 TRACE barbican.model.repositories     entity =
query.one()
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 TRACE barbican.model.repositories   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py", line
2699, in one
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 TRACE barbican.model.repositories     raise
orm_exc.NoResultFound("No row was found for one()")
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 TRACE barbican.model.repositories NoResultFound: No
row was found for one()
2016-02-29 13:43:17.397 TRACE barbican.model.repositories
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 ERROR barbican.api.controllers
[req-0554f272-f711-49b7-a1f7-3b8bc87b431b afaa5d797f3543369d05e370a543ef9d
c141e106a7424d1a8316cf03a8c91e40] Webob error seen
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers Traceback (most
recent call last):
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/api/controllers/__init__.py", line 104, in
handler
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers     return fn(inst,
*args, **kwargs)
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/api/controllers/__init__.py", line 90, in
enforcer
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers     return fn(inst,
*args, **kwargs)
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/api/controllers/__init__.py", line 146, in
content_types_enforcer
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers     return fn(inst,
*args, **kwargs)
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/api/controllers/consumers.py", line 143, in
on_post
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers
controllers.containers.container_not_found()
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/api/controllers/containers.py", line 36, in
container_not_found
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers     pecan.abort(404,
u._('Not Found. Sorry but your container is in '
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pecan/core.py", line 141, in abort
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers     exec('raise
webob_exception, None, traceback')
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/api/controllers/consumers.py", line 141, in
on_post
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers
external_project_id)
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/model/repositories.py", line 360, in get
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers
_raise_entity_not_found(self._do_entity_name(), entity_id)
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers   File
"/opt/stack/barbican/barbican/model/repositories.py", line 2173, in
_raise_entity_not_found
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers     id=entity_id))
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers HTTPNotFound: Not
Found. Sorry but your container is in another castle.
2016-02-29 13:43:17.398 TRACE barbican.api.controllers
2016-02-29 13:43:17.403 INFO barbican.api.middleware.context
[req-0554f272-f711-49b7-a1f7-3b8bc87b431b afaa5d797f3543369d05e370a543ef9d
c141e106a7424d1a8316cf03a8c91e40] Processed request: 404 Not Found - POST
http://192.168.109.129:9311/v1/containers/d96dccd5-0d39-4f67-ba3a-366a84cfd371/consumers/
{address space usage: 220770304 bytes/210MB} {rss usage: 101371904
bytes/96MB} [pid: 52558|app: 0|req: 76/76] 192.168.109.129 () {34 vars in
598 bytes} [Mon Feb 29 13:43:17 2016] POST
/v1/containers/d96dccd5-0d39-4f67-ba3a-366a84cfd371/consumers/ => generated
111 bytes in 63 msecs (HTTP/1.1 404) 4 headers in 179 bytes (1 switches on
core 0)




On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Phillip Toohill <
phillip.toohill at rackspace.com> wrote:

> To further my thoughts, as Adam mentioned, it could be a user issue, which
> to me is what it sounds like. So being able to view the config and have
> other information is pertinent to solving the issue.
>
>
> Phillip V. Toohill III
> Software Developer
> phone: 210-312-4366
> mobile: 210-440-8374
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Phillip Toohill <phillip.toohill at RACKSPACE.COM>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][barbican]TLS container
> could not be found
>
>
> We could use some more information.
>
>
> Phillip V. Toohill III
> Software Developer
> phone: 210-312-4366
> mobile: 210-440-8374
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Madhusudhan Kandadai <madhusudhan.openstack at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 3:21 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][barbican]TLS container
> could not be found
>
> Wondering, have you guys figured out this issue? I am seeing the same
> problem that Jiahao is getting.
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Adam Harwell <adam.harwell at rackspace.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Could you provide your neutron-lbaas.conf? Depending on what version
>> you're using, barbican may not be the default secret backend (I believe
>> this has been fixed). Alternatively, it depends on what user accounts are
>> involved -- this should definitely work if you are using only the single
>> admin account, but we haven't done a lot of testing around the ACLs yet to
>> make sure they are working (and I believe there is still an outstanding bug
>> in Barbican that would cause the ACLs to not function properly in our
>> use-case).
>>
>>
>>     --Adam
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Jiahao Liang <jiahao.liang at oneconvergence.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:18 AM
>> *To:* openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][barbican]TLS container could
>> not be found
>>
>> Hi community,
>>
>> I was going through
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/LBaaS/docs/how-to-create-tls-loadbalancer with
>> devstack. I was stuck at a point when I tried to create a listener within a
>> loadbalancer with this command:
>>
>> neutron lbaas-listener-create --loadbalancer lb1 --protocol-port 443 --protocol TERMINATED_HTTPS --name listener1 --default-tls-container=$(barbican secret container list | awk '/ tls_container / {print $2}')
>>
>> But the command failed with output:
>>
>> TLS container http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/containers/d8b25d56-4fc5-406d-8b2d-5a85de2a1e34 could not be found
>>
>>
>> When I run:
>>
>> barbican secret container list
>>
>> I was able to see the corresponding container in the list and the status
>> is active.
>> (Sorry, the format is a little bit ugly.....)
>>
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------+---------------------------+--------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
>> | Container href
>>         | Name           | Created                   | Status | Type
>>  | Secrets
>>                 | Consumers |
>>
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------+---------------------------+--------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
>> |
>> http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/containers/d8b25d56-4fc5-406d-8b2d-5a85de2a1e34 |
>> tls_container  | 2016-01-28 04:58:42+00:00 | ACTIVE | certificate |
>> private_key=
>> http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/secrets/1bbe33fc-ecd2-43e5-82ce-34007b9f6bfd |
>> None      |
>> |
>>        |                |                           |        |
>> | certificate=
>> http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/secrets/6d0211c6-8515-4e55-b1cf-587324a79abe |
>>           |
>> |
>> http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/containers/31045466-bf7b-426f-9ba8-135c260418ee |
>> tls_container2 | 2016-01-28 04:59:05+00:00 | ACTIVE | certificate |
>> private_key=
>> http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/secrets/dba18cbc-9bfe-499e-931e-90574843ca10 |
>> None      |
>> |
>>        |                |                           |        |
>> | certificate=
>> http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/secrets/23e11441-d119-4b24-a288-9ddc963cb698 |
>>           |
>>
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------+---------------------------+--------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
>>
>>
>> Also, if I did a GET method from a RESTful client with correct
>> X-Auth-Token to the url:
>> http://192.168.100.149:9311/v1/containers/d8b25d56-4fc5-406d-8b2d-5a85de2a1e3,
>> I was able to receive the JSON information of the TLS container.
>>
>>
>> Anybody could give some advice on how to fix this problem?
>>
>> Thank you in advance!
>>
>> Best,
>> Jiahao Liang
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160229/b55283bf/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list