[openstack-dev] [puppet] Midcycle Sprint Summary

Matt Fischer matt at mattfischer.com
Tue Feb 2 20:49:21 UTC 2016


Perhaps we should cover and assign each module in the meeting after the
release?

Actually removing the code and tests in many cases would be a good
assignment for people trying to get more commits and experience.
On Feb 1, 2016 2:22 PM, "Cody Herriges" <cody at herriges.org> wrote:

> Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Last week, we had our midcycle sprint.
> > Our group did a great job and here is a summary of what we worked on:
> >
>
> My attention at the office was stolen quite a few times by finishing up
> work for our production cloud deployment but I worked on the
> pupept-cinder Mitaka deprecations when I could.  First round was done
> which was the removal of old code previously deprecated and I have
> started on a second pass which is new deprecations that are being
> introduced in Mitaka by upstream cinder.
>
> This is the fist time I've sat down to actually just hunt and implement
> deprecations and the number one thing I learned is that it is really
> time consuming.  We'll need several people working on this if we want
> them complete for every module by release time.
>
>
> --
> Cody
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160202/bde43aea/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list