[openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

Samuel Cassiba s at cassiba.com
Mon Dec 19 17:18:20 UTC 2016

On Nov 21, 2016, at 18:35, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>    I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects
> have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to
> apply the tag.
> I'm proposing to EOL all projects that meet one or more of the following
> criteria:
> - The project is openstack-dev/devstack, openstack-dev/grenade or
>  openstack/requirements
> - The project has the 'check-requirements' job listed as a template in
>  project-config:zuul/layout.yaml
> - The project gates with either devstack or grenade jobs
> - The project is listed in governance:reference/projects.yaml and is tagged
>  with 'stable:follows-policy'.
> Some statistics:
> All Repos                      : 1493 (covered in zuul/layout.yaml)
> Checked Repos                  :  406 (match one or more of the above criteria)
> Repos with liberty branches    :  305
> EOL Repos                      :  171 (repos that match the criteria *and* have
>                                       a liberty branch) [1]
> NOT EOL Repos                  :  134 (repos with a liberty branch but
>                                       otherwise do not match) [2]
> DSVM Repos (staying)           :   68 (repos that use dsvm but don't have
>                                       liberty branches)
> Open Reviews                   :   94 (reviews to close)
> Please look over both lists by 2016-11-27 00:00 UTC and let me know if:
> - A project is in list 1 and *really* *really* wants to opt *OUT* of EOLing and
>  why.  Note doing this will amost certainly reduce the testing coverage you
>  have in the gate.
> - A project is in list 2 that would like to opt *IN* to tagging/EOLing
> Any projects that will be EOL'd will need all open reviews abandoned before it
> can be processed.  I'm very happy to do this, or if I don't have permissios to
> do it ask a gerrit admin to do it.
> I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th and Dec
> 3rd (UTC+1100).  Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup zuul/layout.yaml
> to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> Yours Tony.
> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt-L1
> [2] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt-L181
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

The Chef OpenStack cookbooks team is way late to the party. The cookbooks (openstack/cookbook-openstack-*, openstack/openstack-chef-repo ) should have had their liberty branches EOL’d. I have checked and no open reviews exist against liberty.


Samuel Cassiba
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161219/05d14bcf/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list