Open Stack

Rabi Mishra & Rico Lin:
    Thanks very much for your reply! 
    I have submitted a bug report at https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1649217, and will submit a patch to fix it later.


cheers
zengchen



在 2016-12-09 12:45:01，"Rabi Mishra" <ramishra at redhat.com> 写道：

Hi zengchen,

Yeah, the constraint looks incorrect. Not sure if we got it wrong or manila has changed it afterwards. It would be good raise a bug/propose a fix.




On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:26 AM, zengchen <chenzeng765 at 163.com> wrote:

Hi, Heat stackers:
    May I ask a question about creating Manila Share. I see Heat define some constraints
 for property schema 'ACCESS_TYPE' at
 heat.engine.resources.openstack.manila.share.properties_schema[ACCESS_RULES].
 I copy the codes as bellow. The allowed values for 'ACCESS_TYPE' are  'ip', 'domain'.
            ACCESS_TYPE: properties.Schema(
                properties.Schema.STRING,
                _('Type of access that should be provided to guest.'),
                constraints=[constraints.AllowedValues(
                    ['ip', 'domain'])],
                required=True
            ),
However, I see manila has defined different allowed value for 'ACCESS_TYPE', which
 includes 'ip', 'user', 'cert', 'cephx'. So, my question is does heat need some updates? Or
do I miss something?  Hope for your reply. Thanks very much!


cheers
zengchen



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev





--

Regards,
Rabi Misra

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161212/6661f57f/attachment.html>