[openstack-dev] [Vitrage] [Aodh] Vitrage – Aodh Integration

Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL) alexey.weyl at nokia.com
Thu Dec 8 12:46:49 UTC 2016


Hi Julien,

Thank you for your response.

> > We are starting to work on the following BP proposal:
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408060/
> >
> > In this regard, I have two questions:
> > 1. What should this new alarm be called?
> 
> Ah naming things, the biggest problem in CS. Well I'd pick "manual" as
> a name to indicate that nothing is done by Aodh evaluator. Thoughts?

>From Vitrages' point of view "manual" the action is not manual because it is all done automatically.
How about "generic"? "custom"? "external"?

> > 2. As I'm new in Aodh, do you have any pointers or suggestions about
> where to start?
> 
> Not really, though deploying it and using it is probably a good start.
> The spec you started is a good idea to lay out your thoughts and will
> help us understand and point any issue we may have missed.

I have already used ceilometer and aodh in the past. 
I am trying to understand where exactly in Aodh code the new alarm should be because it is not part of the evaluator (as other alarms are).

I am waiting for your thoughts on the spec.

Thanks,
Alexey Weyl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julien Danjou [mailto:julien at danjou.info]
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 2:27 PM
> To: Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL)
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Vitrage] [Aodh] Vitrage – Aodh
> Integration
> 
> On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL) wrote:
> 
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> > We are starting to work on the following BP proposal:
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408060/
> >
> > In this regard, I have two questions:
> > 1. What should this new alarm be called?
> 
> Ah naming things, the biggest problem in CS. Well I'd pick "manual" as
> a name to indicate that nothing is done by Aodh evaluator. Thoughts?
> 
> > 2. As I'm new in Aodh, do you have any pointers or suggestions about
> where to start?
> 
> Not really, though deploying it and using it is probably a good start.
> The spec you started is a good idea to lay out your thoughts and will
> help us understand and point any issue we may have missed.
> 
> I'll review your spec ASAP.
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Julien Danjou
> /* Free Software hacker
>    https://julien.danjou.info */



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list