[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] New extensions for HAProxy driver based LBaaSv2

Michael Johnson johnsomor at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 14:50:06 UTC 2016


Lubosz,

I would word that very differently.  We are not dropping LBaaSv2
support.  It is not going away.  I don't want there to be confusion on
this point.

We are however, moving/merging the API from neutron into Octavia.
So, during this work the code will be transitioning repositories and
you will need to carefully synchronize and/or manage the changes in
both places.
Currently the API changes have patchsets up in the Octavia repository.
However, the old namespace driver has not yet been migrated over.

Michael


On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Kosnik, Lubosz <lubosz.kosnik at intel.com> wrote:
> Hello Zhi,
> So currently we’re working on dropping LBasSv2 support.
> Octavia is a big-tent project providing lbass in OpenStack and after merging
> LBasS v2 API in Octavia we will deprecate that project and in next 2
> releases we’re planning to completely wipe out that code repository. If you
> would like to help with LBasS in OpenStack you’re more than welcome to start
> working with us on Octavia.
>
> Cheers,
> Lubosz Kosnik
> Cloud Software Engineer OSIC
>
> On Dec 6, 2016, at 6:04 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I think that there is a move to Octavia. I suggest reaching out to that
> community and see how these changes can be added. Sounds like a nice
> addition
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> From: zhi <changzhi1990 at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 11:06 AM
> To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] New extensions for HAProxy driver
> based LBaaSv2
>
> Hi, all
>
> I am considering add some new extensions for HAProxy driver based Neutron
> LBaaSv2.
>
> Extension 1, multi subprocesses supported. By following this document[1], I
> think we can let our HAProxy based LBaaSv2 support this feature. By adding
> this feature, we can enhance loadbalancers performance.
>
> Extension 2, http keep-alive supported. By following this document[2], we
> can make our loadbalancers more effective.
>
>
> Any comments are welcome!
>
> Thanks
> Zhi Chang
>
>
> [1]: http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#cpu-map
> [2]:
> http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#option%20http-keep-alive
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list