Open Stack

Any more feedback on this?

> On Aug 18, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Bashmakov, Alexander <alexander.bashmakov at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Concrete example of an api-ref difference between Mitaka and Newton:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356693/1/api-ref/source/v2/images-parameters.yaml
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:sean at dague.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:20 AM
> To: Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com>; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] versioning the api-ref?
> 
>> On 08/18/2016 11:57 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> I guess the intent was to indicate the need for indicating the micro 
>> or in case of Glance minor version bump when required.
>> 
>> The API isn't drastically different, there are new and old elements as 
>> shown in the Nova api ref linked.
> 
> Right, so the point is that it should all be describable in a single document. It's like the fact that when you go to python API docs you get things like - https://docs.python.org/2/library/wsgiref.html
> 
> "New in version 2.5."
> 
> Perhaps if there is a concrete example of the expected differences between what would be in the mitaka tree vs. newton tree was can figure out an appropriate way to express that in api-ref.
> 
>    -Sean
> 
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev