[openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium

Nikolas Hermanns nikolas.hermanns at ericsson.com
Fri Aug 19 07:36:15 UTC 2016


I redeployed the system cause of other reason so ids changed. Problem still exist:
root at node-3:~# ovs-vsctl show
7c5fba05-9094-4306-87ed-2e44f2edc192
    Manager "tcp:192.168.0.4:6640"
        is_connected: true
    Bridge br-int
        Controller "tcp:192.168.0.4:6633"
            is_connected: true
        Port "TUNNEL:2"
            Interface "TUNNEL:2"
                type: vxlan
                options: {key=flow, local_ip="192.168.2.4", remote_ip="192.168.2.1"}
        Port "tap33a54c35-1b"
            Interface "tap33a54c35-1b"
                type: internal
        Port "tap54ea3b3f-ee"
            Interface "tap54ea3b3f-ee"
                type: internal
        Port br-int
            Interface br-int
                type: internal
        Port "tap6cd7d327-11"
            Interface "tap6cd7d327-11"
                type: internal
        Port "qr-15746548-70"
            Interface "qr-15746548-70"
                type: internal
        Port "TUNNEL:10"
            Interface "TUNNEL:10"
                type: vxlan
                options: {key=flow, local_ip="192.168.2.4", remote_ip="192.168.2.3"}
        Port "tap15a2a33f-9f"
            Interface "tap15a2a33f-9f"
                type: internal
        Port "tapfeea7fab-be"
            Interface "tapfeea7fab-be"
                type: internal
        Port "TUNNEL:6"
            Interface "TUNNEL:6"
                type: vxlan
                options: {key=flow, local_ip="192.168.2.4", remote_ip="192.168.2.2"}
        Port "tapc1ad3c0d-3c"
            Interface "tapc1ad3c0d-3c"
                type: internal
    ovs_version: "2.4.1"

## neutron port-list
| fcb2ecbe-07ba-41a1-8c5e-7dac6577d58b |      | fa:16:3e:9a:55:16 | {"subnet_id": "102e7306-8a2d-4448-bf69-9e0c3c8649b4", "ip_address": "172.16.0.130"}  |

## ERROR from the logs:
2016-08-19 07:29:30.170 23329 ERROR neutron.plugins.ml2.managers [req-f228e4bb-0808-42b5-9628-0b2cd9ad1c92 - - - - -] Failed to bind port fcb2ecbe-07ba-41a1-8c5e-7dac6577d58b on host node-3.domain.tld for vnic_type normal using segments [{'segmentation_id': None, 'physical_network': u'physnet1', 'id': u'9c2c66a2-557c-4547-912a-1f043ea76d9f', 'network_type': u'flat'}]
2016-08-19 07:29:30.171 23329 INFO neutron.plugins.ml2.plugin [req-f228e4bb-0808-42b5-9628-0b2cd9ad1c92 - - - - -] Attempt 10 to bind port fcb2ecbe-07ba-41a1-8c5e-7dac6577d58b
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology [req-f228e4bb-0808-42b5-9628-0b2cd9ad1c92 - - - - -] Network topology element has failed binding port:
{
    "class": "networking_odl.ml2.ovsdb_topology.OvsdbNetworkTopologyElement",
    "has_datapath_type_netdev": false,
    "host_addresses": [
        "192.168.0.4"
    ],
    "support_vhost_user": false,
    "uuid": "7c5fba05-9094-4306-87ed-2e44f2edc192",
    "valid_vif_types": [
        "ovs"
    ]
}
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology Traceback (most recent call last):
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/networking_odl/ml2/network_topology.py", line 117, in bind_port
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology     port_context, vif_type, self._vif_details)
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/networking_odl/ml2/ovsdb_topology.py", line 173, in bind_port
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology     raise ValueError('Unable to find any valid segment in given context.')
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology ValueError: Unable to find any valid segment in given context.
2016-08-19 07:29:30.178 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology
2016-08-19 07:29:30.180 23329 ERROR networking_odl.ml2.network_topology [req-f228e4bb-0808-42b5-9628-0b2cd9ad1c92 - - - - -] Unable to bind port element for given host and valid VIF types:
        hostname: node-3.domain.tld
        valid VIF types: vhostuser, ovs
2016-08-19 07:29:30.181 23329 ERROR neutron.plugins.ml2.managers [req-f228e4bb-0808-42b5-9628-0b2cd9ad1c92 - - - - -] Failed to bind port fcb2ecbe-07ba-41a1-8c5e-7dac6577d58b on host node-3.domain.tld for vnic_type normal using segments [{'segmentation_id': None, 'physical_network': u'physnet1', 'id': u'9c2c66a2-557c-4547-912a-1f043ea76d9f', 'network_type': u'flat'}]
2016-08-19 07:29:30.644 23329 INFO networking_odl.journal.journal [-] Syncing update port fcb2ecbe-07ba-41a1-8c5e-7dac6577d58b

Thanks for helping!

BR Nikolas	

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rui Zang [mailto:rui.zang at foxmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 4:26 AM
> To: Nikolas Hermanns; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)
> Cc: Vishal Thapar; Michal Skalski; neutron-dev at lists.opendaylight.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka
> together with ODL-Beryllium
> 
> Cloud you give me the output of `ovs-vsctl show` on node-3?
> 
> On 8/19/2016 5:20 AM, Nikolas Hermanns wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Thanks for the answer. It might be that I did not fully understand the
> networking concept here.
> > OVS on the host node-3 is as well controlled by opendaylight. And
> opendaylight sets up the external network as well. But it is still a flat network
> without segmentation. As far as I understood it, it is the port which connects
> node-3 with the external network. But networking-odl from the beginning
> onwards declines to bind this port.
> >
> > That is my understanding. But I think I am not fully correct.
> >
> > BR Nikolas
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Rui Zang [mailto:rui.zang at foxmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:23 AM
> >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Cc: Vishal Thapar; Nikolas Hermanns; Michal Skalski; neutron-
> >> dev at lists.opendaylight.org
> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error
> >> Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium
> >>
> >> Hi Nikolas,
> >>
> >> First of all, neutron-dev at lists.opendaylight.org (copied) might be a
> >> better place to ask networking-odl questions.
> >>
> >> It seems that the external network you described is not managed by
> >> OpenDaylight, so it failed port binding.
> >>
> >> You probably want to configure multiple mechanism drivers, say if
> >> physnet1 is connected by ovs br-xxx on  node-3.domain.tld, you could
> >> run ovs agent on that host and configure bridge_mappings correctly.
> >> The openvswitch mechanism driver would succeed the port binding.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Zang, Rui
> >>
> >> On 8/17/2016 7:38 PM, Nikolas Hermanns wrote:
> >>> Hey Networking-ODL folks,
> >>>
> >>> I just setup a Mirantis 9.0 release together with Opendaylight Beryllium.
> >> Using networking-odl v2 I see constantly the error:
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.927 4040 ERROR neutron.plugins.ml2.managers
> >>> [req-7e834676-81b4-479b-ad45-fa39f0fabed3 - - - - -] Failed to bind
> >>> port faeaa465-6f08-4097-b173-48636cc71539 on host node-3.domain.tld
> >>> for vnic_type normal using segments [{'segmentation_id': None,
> >>> 'physical_network': u'physnet1', 'id':
> >>> u'58d9518c-5664-4099-bcd1-b7818bea853b', 'network_type': u'flat'}]
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology [req-7e834676-81b4-479b-ad45-
> >> fa39f0fabed3 - - - - -] Network topology element has failed binding port:
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology   File
> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-
> >> packages/networking_odl/ml2/network_topology.py", line 117, in
> >> bind_port
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology     port_context, vif_type,
> >> self._vif_details)
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology   File
> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-
> >> packages/networking_odl/ml2/ovsdb_topology.py", line 172, in
> >> bind_port
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology     raise ValueError('Unable to find
> >> any valid segment in given context.')
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology ValueError: Unable to find any
> >> valid segment in given context.
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.937 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.938 4040 ERROR
> >> networking_odl.ml2.network_topology [req-7e834676-81b4-479b-ad45-
> >> fa39f0fabed3 - - - - -] Unable to bind port element for given host
> >> and valid VIF
> >> types:
> >>> 2016-08-17 11:28:07.939 4040 ERROR neutron.plugins.ml2.managers
> >>> [req-7e834676-81b4-479b-ad45-fa39f0fabed3 - - - - -] Failed to bind
> >>> port faeaa465-6f08-4097-b173-48636cc71539 on host node-3.domain.tld
> >>> for vnic_type normal using segments [{'segmentation_id': None,
> >>> 'physical_network': u'physnet1', 'id':
> >>> u'58d9518c-5664-4099-bcd1-b7818bea853b', 'network_type': u'flat'}]
> >>>
> >>> Looking at the code I saw that you can only bind ports which have a
> >>> valid
> >> segmentation:
> >>> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-
> >> packages/networking_odl/ml2/ovsdb_topology.py(151)bind_port()
> >>>     def bind_port(self, port_context, vif_type, vif_details):
> >>>
> >>>         port_context_id = port_context.current['id']
> >>>         network_context_id = port_context.network.current['id']
> >>>         # Bind port to the first valid segment
> >>>         for segment in port_context.segments_to_bind:
> >>>             if self._is_valid_segment(segment): <-------
> >>>                 # Guest best VIF type for given host
> >>>                 vif_details = self._get_vif_details(
> >>>                     vif_details=vif_details, port_context_id=port_context_id,
> >>>                     vif_type=vif_type)
> >>>                 LOG.debug(
> >>>                     'Bind port with valid segment:\n'
> >>>                     '\tport: %(port)r\n'
> >>>                     '\tnetwork: %(network)r\n'
> >>>                     '\tsegment: %(segment)r\n'
> >>>                     '\tVIF type: %(vif_type)r\n'
> >>>                     '\tVIF details: %(vif_details)r',
> >>>                     {'port': port_context_id,
> >>>                      'network': network_context_id,
> >>>                      'segment': segment, 'vif_type': vif_type,
> >>>                      'vif_details': vif_details})
> >>>                 port_context.set_binding(
> >>>                     segment[driver_api.ID], vif_type, vif_details,
> >>>                     status=n_const.PORT_STATUS_ACTIVE)
> >>>                 return
> >>>
> >>>         raise ValueError('Unable to find any valid segment in given
> >>> context.')
> >>>
> >>> A valid segmentation is defined by:
> >>> [constants.TYPE_LOCAL, constants.TYPE_GRE, constants.TYPE_VXLAN,
> >>> constants.TYPE_VLAN]
> >>>
> >>> The port which I try to bind here is a port on an external network
> >>> which is
> >> flat since we do not have segmentation for external network. Any idea
> >> why it is changed that I can bind this port?
> >>>
> >>> BR Nikolas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> __________________________________________________________
> >> ____________
> >>> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >>> Unsubscribe:
> >>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> 




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list