[openstack-dev] [Nova][API] Need naming suggestions for "capabilities"
jaypipes at gmail.com
Mon Aug 15 15:28:34 UTC 2016
On 08/15/2016 10:50 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com
> <mailto:jaypipes at gmail.com>> wrote:
> On 08/15/2016 09:27 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> After some thought, I think I've changed my mind on referring to
> the adjectives as "capabilities" and actually think that the
> term "capabilities" is better left for the policy-like things.
> My vote is the following:
> GET /capabilities <-- returns a set of *actions* or *abilities* that
> the user is capable of performing
> GET /traits <-- returns a set of *adjectives* or *attributes* that
> may describe a provider of some resource
> I can rename os-capabilities to os-traits, which would make Sean
> Mooney happy I think and also clear up the terminology mismatch.
> /me didn't stop writing previous email to read this first...
> I think traits may be preferable to what I wrote a minute ago (using
> qualifiying words) as this definition maintains separation for the
> semantics of 'what can I do' vs 'what am I like'.
> Plus 'trait' is a word that if/when surfaced into the UI will not
> collide with anything else yet (that I know of). It is a lot like how
> OSC uses 'property', but may not be totally incompatible.
Right, the difference being a property has a key/value structure whereas
a trait in this context is a simple string tag structure.
More information about the OpenStack-dev