Open Stack

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:
> Ideally, I would love to see:
>
>  for node in nodes:
>    ssh $node puppet apply blah-blah
>
> Maybe we're not there, but it only means we have to improve our puppet
> modules.

This is the same thought I had, Shouldn't the config be just a call to
a manifest?

The undercloud should be a simple install process with some config (or
image based deployment). Using Heat to deploy the undercloud means
involves bootstrapping a Heat environment. I believe Ansible feels
like a much better fit for this. What would the user/administrator
want? Is customization of the undercloud something realistically
happening?

regards,


Gerard

-- 

   Gerard Braad | http://gbraad.nl
   [ Doing Open Source Matters ]