[openstack-dev] [release][requirements][packaging][summit] input needed on summit discussion about global requirements
robertc at robertcollins.net
Thu Apr 21 02:10:53 UTC 2016
On 20 April 2016 at 05:44, Clint Byrum <clint at fewbar.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Michał Jastrzębski's message of 2016-04-18 10:29:20 -0700:
>> What I meant is if you have liberty Nova and liberty Cinder, and you
>> want to upgrade Nova to Mitaka, you also upgrade Oslo to Mitaka and
>> Cinder which was liberty either needs to be upgraded or is broken,
>> therefore during upgrade you need to do cinder and nova at the same
>> time. DB can be snapshotted for rollbacks.
> If we're breaking backward compatibility even across one release, that
> is a bug. You should be able to run Liberty components with Mitaka
> Libraries. Unfortunately, the testing matrix for all of the combinations
> is huge and nobody is suggesting we try to solve that equation.
Sadly no: we don't make that guarantee today. I think we should, but
there isn't consensus - at least amongst the folk that have been
debating the backwards compat for libraries spec - that it is actually
*desirable*. Please, come to the session and help build consensus in
> However, to the point of distros: partial upgrades is not the model distro
> packages work under. They upgrade what they can, whether they're a rolling
> release, or 7 year cycle LTS's. When the operator says "give me the new
> release", the packages that can be upgraded, will be upgraded. And if
> Mitaka Nova is depending on something outside the upper constraints in
> another package on the system, the distro will just hold Nova back.
And presumably all of OpenStack.
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hpe.com>
HP Converged Cloud
More information about the OpenStack-dev